HEARTIEST CONGRATULATIONS

Dear Friend

Tried calling you on your phone numbers , but could not get through , i think the numbers have changed.Congrats on winning the RS seat and hope you continue with BJP for long .

Going back I still remember
1) I had a honour to be in your chmabers in connection with a matter about privy purse which was to be argued by you in the Supreme Court by you on that day , and Rani was on record , within five minutes you got the telecon from Dada Acharya Kripalani , when he summoned you to immediately come to parliament where the new bill was supposed to be introdcued and you were to reply back on behalf of the party.

2) once again i had a occassion to be in your chambers with rani , as u were abraod while i was there u returned along with sme forigners after meeting us , rani and myself left for her chambers at the abckside of ur bunglow.And while going back you were there in the lawns and having beer , and you called me also to join the team ,but I declined as I was not used to hard drinks .

There are many such occassions , would reaally like to meet you

with due respect

warm regards

K C Lala ( Ret Sr Advocate )
24378889

Victory Celebration

Shree Ram Jeth Malani Ji,

Sir,
Heartiest Congratulations on your great victory. Now it will be very difficult to miss the proceedings of Rajya Sabha as there will be discussion worth the time since number one advocate of the country will be delivering and leading the all members. Your proved leadership will bring more charm to the upper house. Further I have no words matching your status. It will be my privilege to see you in Bombay at your convenient.
Congratulations once again.
Jaswant Singh Komal
Advocate
Cell : 09417005125

Congratulations

My Hearty Congratulations for your Success as Rajyasaba M.P. I Pray God to give you long Healthy Life.

P.NALLASAMY, B.Sc., B.L.,
ADVOCATE
832, PERIYAR NAGAR,
RAJAGOPALAPURAM,
PUDUKKOTTAI,
TAMILNADU
SOUTH INDIA
CELL : 9750103667

MAIL ID: raja_chandramohan@yahoo.com

Congratulation

Dear Sir,

First of all Congratulation for wining RS seat.

Regards

Girish

Clarifications regarding Clause VI (a) of Creamy layer criteria ( Income Limit) amongst OBCs

This is my last hope from You Sir, because I didn’t get reply from Under Secretary (Estt. Res) Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Joint Secretary Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment

I beg you. Please give me quick reply as my son would be having his counseling for admission into engineering college this July 2010.

As per Clause VI (a) of Creamy layer criteria “Persons having gross annual income of Rs. 4.50 lakh or above for a period of three consecutive years or possessing wealth above the exemption limit as prescribed in the Wealth Act for a period of three consecutive years will be treated as creamy layer.

Here the word “for a period of three consecutive years” is important means that from last 3 financial years if the income of any one financial year is less then Rs. 4.50 lakh will not come under creamy layer and get the reservation.

Year Income
2007-2008 2,00,000.00 Rs.
2008-2009 4,60,000.00 Rs.
2009-2010 5,60,000.00 Rs.

Q.1. As per my interpretation a person with annual income ( business income” )as per above mentioned years for three consecutive years does not come under creamy layer as his income for one of the three consecutive year is less than Rs.4.5 lakh/annum.

Is my interpretation right or wrong ?

help

Sir,
I am a law student studying in 4th semester in Kiit Law school Bhubaneswar. I am very sorry to bother you like this but i need to know that what does it take to be your intern. I am fascinated by your creativity and your wisdom.
I would be highly obliged if you can forgive me for bothering you like this and for considering me as your intern. I am attaching my C.V along with this post.

Regards

Arjun

(arjunmehra.kls@gmail.com )

MY SALUTE TO SHRI RAM JETHMALANI JI

SIR,
I RESPECT YOU FORM MY HEART AND ALWAYS PRAY TO GOD THAT HE WILL GIVE YOU MORE LIFE SO THAT YOU FIGHT FOR JUSTICE.

THANKS
KUSH KALRA
krrish.kush@gmail.com

Cry the Beloved Shikarpur

I am Hisam Memon born in on 5th September 1976 at Shikarpur, Sindh, Pakistan. I love my Shikarpur and I am working on Shikarpur and adore all those whose migrated from Shikarpur to India or anywhere else after partition. Shiree Ram Jethmalani is very respectable person for me, that is why, I have joined this blog and request him to join our group on face book on the following url:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=73795529124&ref=search&sid=746909166.1827779975..1

Apart from this, I made group on yahoo too, which has been working since 2004, following is the url to join it;

www.groups.yahoo.com/group/myshikarpur

Apart from these groups I have created many pages regarding the personalities of Shikarpur on face book viz, Sami سامي, Shaikh Ayaz شيخ اياز , Mumtaz Mangi, Zia Shah, Zubair Soomro, Dr.Anwar Figar Hakro, Khalid Bhatti, Zia Shah, My Shikarpur’s Picture شڪارپور جون تصويرون and Murid Setharja village etc.

I hope, Shree Jethmalani should join these pages, many historical pictures, articles, and many things have been collected there.

I have tried to collect all Shikarpuri people throughout the world.

Dear Ram Jee you are requested to write for Shikarpur in our group and on the pages , it will really be inspiring act for all of us. People really want to hear and read you about Shikarpur, do share your pictures, older pictures , do tell us about the people who built up Shikarpur. You are a live liberary of our Shikarpur. I am going to make page on you very soon.

Our message is to get better, proper and peaceful and loving future, hope all will support us.

Hisam Memon
9th Feb 2010 Karachi
3:11 am
memonhisam@yahoo.co.uk
memonhisam@hotmail.com
memonhisam@gmail.com
Cell# +923343675045

Threat of the Dragon

The much maligned Jaswant Singh of the BJP, in his book titled “Defending India” published in 1999, with sadness warned the nation that India’s management of Sino-Indian relations has been a dismal failure and the nation continues to pay the price for it. In 1950 India fought with all its strength to seat China in the Security Council putting it in a position to veto even legitimate protection India may need for its security and survival. China is a nuclear power and has proliferated nuclear technology and weapons to India’s traditional foes. It has swallowed vast stretches of Indian territory and is feverishly trying to grab more. We have lost our nerve and our response is silence of the lambs being led to slaughter.

Ten more years have passed since the warning was published by a responsible Minister of the Government of India. As of today China has assembled massive military forces on the defacto border. Its army has indulged in arrogant incursions into Indian territory at least once almost every month. They deliberately leave, only to insult and annoy us, tell tale evidence of their visits. Cigarette packets, empty cartons of food and even cases of bullets fired are left strewn all over. In Chinese language, they have put markings on stone boulders proclaiming – “This is China”. For sometime it was foot soldiers of the Chinese infantry that indulged in these provocative actions. Now mounted troops have joined them. In May last year at a meeting of officers, the Chinese openly laid claim to part of Sikkim. They have often laid claims to Arunchal and rudely objected to President Prathiba Patil’s visit to Tawang. Vast infrastructure projects are in operation and roads are being constructed right into Arunachal.

But our Government is busy downplaying all these provocative activities. Just a couple of days back a Journalist Manu Pubby asked our Home Minister about the Chinese irritating acts of trespass. In his answer the Minister spoke instead of the poor reporting by the Indian Press which claimed, may be mistakenly, that some of our soldiers had been killed in the skirmishes. The Minister’s answer was plainly evasive. Fortunately the protocol of the interview did not seem to permit any supplementary questions. I mean fortunate for the Minister:
Our armed forces by contrast are concerned at the smugness of the civilian authorities. The Air Force Chief complains that we have less that 1/3rd of the Chinese air strike power. The Naval Chief announces that the naval power of the Chinese is vastly superior to ours. The figures of the two armies should remind us of the humiliating defeat that we suffered in 1962. Some perceptive citizens are rightly in panic and recall the disaster, that the credulity and criminal negligence of the Nehru Government inflicted upon India. It is not the purpose of this article to advocate war with the Chinese Dragon. What I advocate is that repetition of Chinese aggression of 1962 is highly probable. We are lucky if it is not imminent. We must get ready to counter the threat and summon to our help all the soft power we can commandeer.

Mao-Tse-Tung, the creator of Communist China has left a will and testament for succeeding communist administrations. “Tibet” he said “is the palm of the hand which has five fingers – Ladhak, Sikkim, Nepal, Bhutan and NEFA, (present day Arunachal)”. These areas must all be liberated and absorbed into China”. It is foolish to imagine that Chinese leaders have abandoned this dream or rejected the will of their supreme leader. The way China is building up its military power far beyond the needs of legitimate defense is almost conclusive proof of its hostile designs on Indian territory and our national integrity.
China is a nation on the move as millions of rural people leave their villages and get into the cities looking for work. It is estimated that about 200 millions have left their home villages in search of work in cities around China. It is the largest migration in human history. Pushed by the timeless poverty of the country side, this army of migrants is now fuelling the economic boom that is putting cheap toys, clothes, Television sets, computers and consumables of all kinds on the shelves of the world stores. After Chairman Mao’s death in 1976, his successors have discarded the Marxist economic model and have adopted a unique brand of man-eat-man capitalism, officially mis-described as Socialism with Chinese characteristics. Today Chinese GDP is three times bigger than ours, its foreign Exchange reserves are six times bigger and its annual growth is 15% against our measly 5%. This new found wealth produces

arrogance and aggression far more vicious than in 1962. If you don’t believe it ask the Uighars of Xinjiang, the survivors of Tiananmen or the harmless Falungong. As China’s wealth grows, and so does it’s fire power, Mao’s five finger hand becomes easier to grab. Moreover we have done nothing to make them even suspect that we are less unprepared and stupid than we were some five decades ago.
Soon after Pandit Nehru became the Prime Minister of India, he called a Conference of Asian Political leaders. It was a grand affair. India-China friendship was its conspicuous feature, but significantly the flag of independent Tibet proudly flew along side that of China. In less than four years, Tibet lost its independence and was forcibly annexed by the Chinese. Its conquest and forcible occupation were completed in 1959, when the Dalai Lama and his small band of followers escaped and sought safety and refuge on Indian territory. While we did grant asylum to the refugees from Tibet, we shamelessly acquiesced in its unlawful annexation, an unintended effect perhaps of Panchsheel and Hindi-Cheeni Bhai Bhai slogans.
The palm was taken but the fingers yet remained to be twisted and mastered at some more propitious time. But the nibbling at our borders continued. The whole world could see it so did Pandit Nehru’s Government. But he was too embarrassed to take the people of India into confidence and share the dangerous truth with them. Aggressive actions of the Chinese were not even clandestine.

They put across their claims to Indian territory in written communications to our great Leader. Whether the whole cabinet knew of them is debatable. But what is indisputable is the fact that we did not make any serious effort to halt the march of Chinese arrogance and show of force. Time came when we could not just witness the provocative challenge and put up a benign smile on our faces. When concealment became impossible, a confused Prime Minister pretending to have power which he did not possess, insanely declared “I have asked the Indian army to throw out the Chinese”. This thoughtless command was issued from Madras airport while the great leader was in transit to Colombo, his destination on that occasion.
We suffered disastrous defeat. Never has India suffered such humiliation. The Parliament passed a resolution accusing the Chinese of immoral ingratitude and wanton aggression. “The flames of liberty and sacrifice have been kindled anew and this house affirms the firm resolve of the Indian people to drive out the aggressor from the sacred soil of India”. Pandit Nehru knew that this too was just plain rhetoric. No wonder he died a broken man, his credulity badly exposed, his Chinese policy and Panchsheel in shambles and his life’s work ending in smoke.
No successor Prime Minister has ever dared publicly to recall the promises made to the people or take some sensible steps to fulfil them. Smt. Indira Gandhi without quid pro quo, restored full diplomatic relations in 1976. Mr. Vajpayee returned from China only

to tell the nation that both sides had realized that the issue was intractable. It would naturally take long to resolve. It was best to put it on back burner and instead concentrate on other matters, of course of no relevance to the pledges of 1962. The youthful Rajiv Gandhi in December, 1988 only managed to set up a working committee of officials of both countries to discuss issues relating to the boundary dispute and to prepare the ground for resolving them, another semantic fraud. In the 90’s, Prime Minister Narshima Rao chloroformed the nation with a Treaty of Peace and Tranquility which suited only the Chinese. Even a ferocious Tiger that has filled its belly retires to a corner of the forest to have a peaceful snooze to digest its prey. The NDA and the UPA Governments have since seen how the Chinese wealth and military force are growing and our influence in the power centers’ of the world fast dwindling. It is not just panic that makes sensible people apprehensive of possible Chinese attacks on the northern and north eastern sections of our border. Our trusting Pandit Nehru proved a disaster, can we trust Dr. Manmohan Singh now ?
Yesterday I attended for a while, a seminar in Delhi organized on this very matter by Dr. Shyama Prasad Research Foundation. Brilliant galaxy of scholars, writers and experts in the field of foreign affairs had been put together. The concern and anxiety on the faces of all were evident, so was the search of some credible solution. I could not wait at the seminar for long and what I write here are in

brief my thoughts which I wanted to express but could not for lack of time and opportunity.
First, let me repeat I do not suggest a war with China. Our membership of United Nations and adherence to its Charter puts it out of the list of available alternatives. Secondly we are bound by a constitutional commitment under the 51st Article of our basic law to eschew war as an instrument of foreign policy. Thirdly, the same Article mandates that all international disputes should be resolved by the pacific method of arbitration.
We must, therefore, loudly proclaim our peaceful intentions and desire for a honorable and urgent settlement. Arbitration is the best method of resolution. International tribunals are available for this purpose. In 1947 we determined the boundaries of Bengal, Punjab and Assam by appointing a commission of three judges who did a remarkable job. We graciously accepted its awards and no difficulty of any kind has arisen since then.
Let us be clear that our weaker economic and military position in any event should put armed conflict out of our thoughts. The Charter however permits defensive arrangements between nations. We must endeavour to have such defense treaties with friendly democracies of the world. The US, the European Union, the Commonwealth countries, Russia and Japan are candidates for forging with them bilateral or multilateral alliances. This is nothing but practice of the old doctrine of the Balance of Power, a dominant

principle of successful diplomacy for more than two hundred years. When a powerful state poses threat of aggression and war, the only solution is a coalition of other powers who individually are not strong enough to stand up to the aggressor. We had a treaty of the same kind with the Soviet Union once. Let us then offer Arbitration to the Chinese. If they reject it, India will have strengthened its moral case and created reliable friends to fight on our side. Will Foreign Minister Krishna care to ponder?

RAM JETHMALANI

Letter dated 19.8.2009

Date : 19-8-2009
To ,
The Editor,

Sir,
Democracy would become a graveyard if there were no interesting controversies to keep it throbbing and in good heath. I congratulate BJP Leader Jaswant Singh for publishing his book on Jinnah. He has written as an honest historian exercising his freedom of thought and speech. BJP President Rajnath’s response is to say the least unfortunate. Jaswant’s two conclusions that the late Qaide Azam Jinnah was every inch a secularist and the partition of India was neither his goal nor his obsession, are fundamentally right. No one can or should question them. Every person interested in historical truth must dispassionately digest the formidable evidence marshaled by the Author. A debate is welcome but I hope it will remain at an appropriately exalted level.
Nobel Prize winner the distinguished Prof. Amartya Sen in his famous book “The Argumentative Indian” at page 51 writes:-
“ While it is often assumed that in pre-partition India the claim that the Hindus and Muslims formed two distinct nations – not two parts of the same Indian nation – was formulated by Muhammad Ali Jinnah (in the context of making a case for the partition of the country on religious lines) it was in fact Savarkar who had floated the idea well before – more than fifteen years earlier than – Jinnah’s first invoking of the idea, Nathuram Godse, who murdered Mahatma Gandhi for his failure to support the demands of Hindu politics of the day, was a disciple of Savarkar”.
Jaswant Singh is in great company.
Thanking you,
RAM JETHMALANI

Behind India’s Budget

The Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee with perfect justification and aplomb announced to the House that the Congress led UPA Government had come back to power with a mandate. This mandate is a vote for country’s stability and prosperity. It is a mandate for inclusive growth and equitable development. He then assured the House that the Government has accepted the mandate with humility and a firm resolve to do all that it can for the welfare of the nation.
He did not forget to express his gratitude for the faith reposed in the Government by the people and the responsibility that comes with it. He was conscious of the great challenge of rising expectations of the younger generation. The population is restless for improvement of life and increase of happiness. No sensible person will disagree with the Minister’s analysis of the electoral verdict. Moreover the verdict has immunized the Government from blackmail and restored to it full freedom of action. Its plain duty is to formulate correct policies and execute them with transparency and absolute honesty.
I genuinely want the Government to succeed in realizing its proclaimed targets and in fulfilling its promises to the somewhat uncritical and trusting voters of India. I hope and pray that the Government does not betray this trust.
Unfortunately the rest of the budget speech and the actions of the Government, since it was reinstalled in power, do not provide an adequate assurance that the Government honestly intends to serve the nation. I must hasten to articulate my misgivings.
For many years in the past various countries have been trying to evolve a mechanism to impose on their governments a duty of fiscal prudence. Just as an individual, who keeps spending more than he earns is almost sure to land into insolvency, so also the Government. Populist pressures often produce governmental profligacy. Every democratic government wishes to keep its voters happy very often by spending on them what they cannot really afford. It has been said for long that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Now a new proverb has taken its place: ‘power corrupts but the prospect of loosing power corrupts absolutely’. The temptation to over spend and bribe voters with expensive goodies is irresistible when elections are drawing near. Expensive food is sold cheap, huge subsidies are provided for seeds and fertilizers to farmers, public services are made cheaper and loss producing and enormous debts are written off. The common man is deluded for a while but he faces the evil consequences only after he has given away his vote for short term gains followed by bigger losses.
The Americans tried to achieve this by legislation. Starting in 1985 with the Gramm Rudman Hollings (GRH) Act. In India we started thinking on the same lines nearly 10 years ago. And in 2003 we enacted the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003.
It prescribes in detail the contents of the annual budget. The medium term fiscal policy statement should tell the people how the balance between income and expenditure is going to be maintained and how scarce capital is proposed to be spent for productive purposes only.
A fiscal policy strategy statement must explain the scheme of taxation, expenditure, market borrowing and the strategic priorities of the government and the rationale for any significant or novel changes in fiscal management Micro Economic framework statement containing the governments honest assessment of the growth prospect of the economy and the assumptions on which the forecast is based, is a further mandatory requirement.
The more important part is its Section 4. Totally forbidding unaffordable expenses, the Government is mandated to take appropriate measures to reduce fiscal deficit as well as revenue deficit to zero by March of this year. In this year government was required to step into a new era of revenue surplus.
Let us now see what the Finance Minister has done with his budget and his speech discussing his proposals and prognosis. The deficit has not only not been brought down to zero but has instead jumped from 2.5% of the GDP to 6.2%. In other words it has more than doubled. The fiscal deficit is an enormous figure of 4.5 lac crores as against 1.33 lac crores of the earlier year. The framers of the Fiscal Management Act had permitted such a deviation only in case of a threat to national security or natural calamity or some
other cause of the same character as the two specifically mentioned. Every lawyer knows that general words following specific words are always construed as being limited in their characteristics of the latter. Nothing analogous to War or rebellion or a Tsunami has happened in this country. No opportunity was provided to Parliament to understand the governments statutory duties and approve of the governments extraordinary profligacy amounting to criminal breach of trust.
More frightening is the Revenue Deficit. It will grow from about 55000 crores to a wallopping 283000 crores or 4.8% of the G.D.P. These enormous sums have to be procured by market borrowing. Lenders naturally expecting rise of inflation will refuse to dish out money except at increased rates of interest. Nothing may remain out of the borrowed money to spend on creation of jobs and employment or relief to victims of economic distress. Even an incurable optimist will not be sure of being able to augment manufactures, exports or domestic demand. The Finance Minister is thus no longer a prudent manager but a reckless gambler. The Fiscal Management Act is just dead. No justification is offered for its demise. If the market does not provide funds for the gamble it is certain that monies will be raised by printing more paper, a sure way of producing unbearable price rises and public misery.
One Hasan Ali Khan stud farm owner living in Pune had in the UBS bank, Zurich as on 8th December, 2006 a credit of more than eight billion US dollars equivalent to about Rupees 36000 crores. He pays income-tax in India on a declared income of rupees thirty lakhs a year. Investigations started in the year 2007 have disclosed that his account started with an initial deposit of US dollars 1.5 million in the year 1982. He was introduced to the UBS Bank by the notorious Adnan Khashoggi, a friend of an equally notorious Chandraswamy. Initial Singapore deposit was then transferred to Zurich, where by 1997 it had grown to 6.5 billion US dollars. In the next four months it rose to a little more than 8 billion dollars. Hasan Ali Khan was thus making deposits in this account of approximately 3500 crores a year. His last deposit in the bank is expressly marked with the legend “Arms sale”.
What is astonishing that this influential offender has never been arrested. It speaks volumes of his powerful connections. There is also reason to believe that he has other conspirators, two of them are Tapurias of Calcutta. The case was being treated as a simple case of tax evasion but in 2007, fortunately for India the Enforcement authorities asked for assistance from the Swiss under the Mutual Assistance arrangement existing between the two countries. The Swiss complained that the Indian authorities had enclosed with their request some forged documents and also wanted to know whether the Indian investigation was into an offence of money laundering. An affirmative answer from India would have brought
about the necessary disclosure of persons involved in this stupendous fiscal scam. Since April, 2007 till today the Indian Government has not responded to the Swiss querry. It should be plain to every one that at the highest level this investigation is sought to be frustrated because the persons involved are too powerful and the disclosure of their names would shake up the government and destroy its credibility.
People are entitled to ask why instead of borrowing phenomenal amounts of money from the market were not effective steps taken to get at these funds and the crooks who hold them. Why Hasan Ali Khan is going about as a rich tycoon and a welcome socialite?.
Another startling fact which has now come to light is that the German Government by hefty bribing of one of the bank employee has managed to get information about these powerful offenders. Some are in Germany, some in USA and some in India. It is said that of all the countries of the world the deposits of Indian criminals are the highest. They are of the order of about 1500 billion US dollars an amount, if retrieved, would wipe out our national debt domestic and foreign and allow this country to have tax free budgets for many years. Finance Minister Prahab Mukherjee would have become God for the people of India. The question is why did he miss this great honour?.
The behaviour of the Indian authorities has to be contrasted with what the Government of United States had done to this very bank. They threatened to arrest the officers of the bank available in the United States. The Bank has agreed to disclose the names of all
and they have already disclosed a large number of names to the U.S. Government. The bank has further paid a huge penalty of about 750 million dollars. U.S. Government has only agreed that further arrest and prosecution of its officers will be deferred during such time that the Bank is continuing its disclosures.
In the meantime the Swiss authority have already declared that no request for assistance has emanated from India. This fact has come to the notice of the SEBI and RBI. Both the authorities had taken some adverse steps against this bank. Government has on the contrary reversed these actions and done illegitimate favours to it. A very strong suspicion to say the least exists that the Government is determined to see that the bank does not make any embarrassing disclosures. To save face and to create some pretence of some action being taken a complaint has now been filed in the end of December last year against Hasan Ali Khan u/s 16(3b) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and a show cause notice has been issued to him on that complaint.
Transparency International India publicly lamented the apathy of the Indian government in seeking information from the German Government about millions of dollars of unaccounted money
belonging to the people of India lying in Liechtenstein a small country near Germany. The complaint now filed against Hasan Ali is perhaps a half-hearted response to what was becoming serious public embarrassment caused by the highly respected N. G. O.
A group of citizens then took the matter to the Supreme Court invoking its jurisdiction to compel the authorities to enforce the law against powerful offenders and to seek restitution of India’s stolen wealth. In these proceedings the Government was compelled to file a somewhat cursory Affidavit in reply to the Petition. They disclosed that from February 2008 they have been asking German Government through their diplomatic channel for this information. They maintained that there has been some correspondence too between India and Germany. They have also admitted that information has been made available to the Central Government on 18th of March, 2009 about Indians involved. However, the Government is determined to conceal this information from the people. The excuse is that the Germans have provided this evidence on condition of strict confidentiality. This is a most ridiculous claim. Germans are not interested in hiding the names of Indian criminals. What is the use of having the names of criminals, if you cannot use them? This kind of confidentiality is a false pretext and a continuing fraud. There is reason to believe that the names disclosed include some occupants of the highest decks of executive power. The disclosure will shake the government out of office and land some ostensibly respectable people behind the bar, assuming there are some honest policemen left. Even when compelled by Press disclosures to seek information from the Germans the route for seeking it was dishonestly selected to allow the defence of confidentiality to be set up against the owners of the stolen wealth to shield the thieves. This is not just routine evasion of tax but laundering the proceeds of criminal activity.

RAM JETHMALANI